Adrien Verdelhan Presentation

The International CAPM Redux

Francesca Brusa (Oxford)
Tarun Ramadorai (Oxford and CEPR)
Adrien Verdelhan (MIT Sloan and NBER)

March 2015

Aggregate Foreign Equity Holdings (as % of global GDP)

adrienp1

Motivation

  • Large increase in financial integration over the past 30 years.
    • Aggregate foreign equity holdings, as a % of global GDP: from 3% in the 1980s to approximately 30% in 2011.
    • Foreign equity holdings of the U.S.: $6 trillion.
  • What are the expected returns on those foreign equity holdings?
    • Finance logic:
      • If an asset’s return tends to be low in bad times, the asset is risky. Its expected return should be above the risk-free rate.
  • How to measure bad times?
    • I Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM): Aggregate market return
  • How to compare returns?
    • Foreign equity returns are in foreign currencies

Currency Risk

  • Exchange rate risk should matter. . .
    • When investors invest abroad, but consume at home, and domestic and foreign purchasing powers differ.
  • Yet, empirical evidence is diffcult to obtain.
    • International CAPM of Dumas and Solnik (1995): world stock market return + three bilateral exchange rates (Yen, Mark, and Pound).
  • Recent findings: Two risk factors account for a large share of systematic changes in bilateral exchange rates
    • Idea: Instead of using raw bilateral exchange rates, use currency risk factors that summarize their systematic variation.

This Paper

  • 1. Three factors describe the time-series of foreign equity benchmark returns
    • Smaller difference between expected and realized returns than in the competitors’ models (World CAPM, International CAPM, and Fama-French factors)
  • 2. Those three factors account for a large share of foreign equity mutual funds’ and macro/emerging hedge funds’ returns
  • 3. A simple reduced-form model to study the interaction between currency and equity risk

Realized vs Predicted Excess Returns

adrienp2

Literature

  • World CAPM:
    • Sharpe (1964) and Lintner (1965) to Stehle (1977), Solnik (1974), . . .
    • Korajczyk and Viallet (1989), Harvey (1991), Chan, Karolyi and Stulz (1992), Bekaert and Harvey (1995), Karolyi and Stulz (1996).
  • International CAPM:
    • Solnik (1974), Sercu (1980), Stulz (1981), Adler and Dumas (1983), . . .
    • Bekaert and Hodrick (1992), Ferson and Harvey (1993), Ferson and Harvey (1994), Bekaert (1995, 1996), Dumas and Solnik (1995), De Santis and Gerard (1998), Harvey, Solnik, and Zhou (2002)
  • New equity factors and frictions:
    • Chaieb and Errunza (2007), Bekaert, Harvey and Lundblad (2007); Hou, Karolyi, and Kho (2011), Karolyi, Lee and van Dijk (2012), Karolyi and Wu (2014), Malkhozov, Mueller, Vedolin, and Venter (2014)
  • Currency drivers:
    • order
      ows (e.g., Evans and Lyons, 2002, and Froot and Ramadorai, 2005) and risk factors (e.g., Lustig, Roussanov and Verdelhan, 2011, 2014, Menkhoff, Sarno, Scheming, and Schrimpf, 2012, Maggiori, 2012, Lettau, Maggiori, and Weber, 2013, and Verdelhan, 2014)

Road map

  • Empirical evidence:
    • Equity benchmark indices
    • Hedge funds and mutual funds
  • Theoretical framework:
    • Intuition
    • Replication in a reduced-form model
  • Conclusion

Empirical Asset Pricing

Asset Pricing

adrienp3

Equity Literature Summary

adrienp4

Currency Literature Summary

adrienp5

Intuition

adrienp6

This Paper: International CAPM Redux

adrienp7

Data and Estimation

  • Test assets: from 46 developed and emerging countries, spanning value, growth, and country index returns from
    1/1976 to 12/2013.
  • Risk factors: global equity factor (built from local currency equity returns) and two currency factors: Dollar and Carry
  • Estimation: time-varying betas obtained on rolling windows

adrienp8

adrienp9

Expected vs Realized Equity Excess Returns

adrienp10

Time-varying Factor Betas: Developed Markets

adrienp11

Time-varying Factor Betas: Emerging Markets

adrienpn1

Realized vs Predicted Excess Returns

adrienp12

Robustness Checks

  • Other comparisons of the pricing errors:
    • Histograms and kernel density estimates of rolling alphas
    • Rolling mean absolute alphas
  • Even if the market prices of risk are estimated (Fama-McBeth procedure), the CAPM Redux still compares favorably:
    • the market prices of risk are positive and significant for our three factors
    • equity risk is priced for the CAPM, International CAPM, and FF models, but not the other factors (except GBP); the prices of risk appear further removed from the mean of the risk factors.
  • Subsamples:
    • time-windows (increasing sizes starting from 1976 or backwards from 2013)
    • test assets (country aggregates, developed vs emerging markets)
    • length of the rolling windows

Kernel Density of Rolling Alphas

adrienp13

Rolling Mean Absolute Alphas

adrienp14

Correlation Between Equity Returns & Currency Factors

adrienp15

Mutual and Hedge Fund Returns

Hedge Funds and Mutual Funds

adrienp16

Mutual Funds’ Significant Exposure to Currency Factors

adrienp17

\Macro/Emerging” Hedge Funds’ Significant Exposure to Currency Factors

adrienp18

Statistical Significance of Positive HF and MF’s Alphas

adrienp19

Theoretical Framework

Intuition

adrienp22

Framework

  • Assume that financial markets are complete (thus log changes in exchange rates are differences in log SDF)
  • Start from the law of motion of each SDF, which depends on country-specific and global shocks
  • Assume that each country-aggregate dividend growth ratedepends on the same shocks as the SDF
  • Two key assumptions:
    • Prices of risk are time-varying (time-varying currency risk premia)
    • One global shock affects all SDF in the same way (role for a pure equity risk factor)

Reduced-Form Model with Endogenous Exchange Rates

adrienp21

Model Solution

  • Simple and tractable reduced-form model:
    • Interest rates, exchange rates, and price-dividend ratios in closed-forms, as well as realized and expected equity and currency excess returns, and equity and currency risk factors.
  • Implications:
    • The world stock market return in U.S. dollars depends on all global shocks.
    • No role for bilateral exchange rates in theory
    • But in the model the market price of global equity risk depends on several state variables.
      • Those state variables are unknown to the econometrician.
      • Quantities and market prices of risk evolve at different frequencies.
  • Role for currency factors in practice, even in simulated data

Realized vs Predicted Excess Returns: Simulated Data

adrienp20

Conclusion

  • Three factors (Global Equity, Dollar, and Carry) describe the time-series of foreign equity benchmark returns.
    • Predicted and realized equity excess returns are closer than in the competitors’ models.
  • Currency risk matters for foreign equity mutual fund and \macro/emerging” hedge fund returns.
  • Interaction between currency and equity risk in a simple reduced-form model:
    • Time-variation in quantities and prices of risk is key.


?>